etest question

Posted By: Kirk Harding

etest question - March 25, 2014 11:01 am UTC

I'll be getting the 92 awd etested when I get home and its been a while since I did one with a AWD, with my beater fwd I just stuck some alcohol from the drug store and she passed, but my AWD is a different story, I have removed all the emissions equipment and I have 650's,burnt chip,adpr,walbro 225, maf-t, but..... I do have a catalytic converter at least.
Do they fail if there is a check engine light or is it simply based on the exhaust readings?
If it fails could it be as easy as turning the fuel pressure down?
Can I use my logger to check if it will pass?
Posted By: Jeff Mitchell

Re: etest question - March 25, 2014 01:24 pm UTC

For a '92 nothing has changed with the way they do the test. They will stick a sniffer in the tailpipe and measure actual emissions during a 2-stage idle test.

They don't care if the check engine light is on. On a '92 You could be running the car with a potato instead of a computer for all they care. Hence you can't use the logger to know if you will pass.

Generally if the car is tuned well and you have a wirjubg cat you should be fine. If you've got mechanical issues (intake leaks, mismatched injectors and chip, etc) then you'll likely fail.

Did the car pass last time, and have you made changes since?
Posted By: Bryan Lawrence

Re: etest question - March 25, 2014 02:39 pm UTC

Where do I get a wirjubg cat, that sounds like my ticket to passing!!

I would just make sure you are idling at a right afr and that you are idling low enough.

As Jeff said as long as the car is well tuned you should be good.
Posted By: Stephen Richardson

Re: etest question - March 25, 2014 03:11 pm UTC

Is it a test for transfer of ownership or just for a sticker renew?
Posted By: Jeff Mitchell

Re: etest question - March 25, 2014 03:39 pm UTC

Originally Posted by Bryan Lawrence
Where do I get a wirjubg cat, that sounds like my ticket to passing!!


Doh! But I googled wirjubg cat and found this awesome picture:

[Linked Image]
Posted By: Lucian Marta

Re: etest question - March 25, 2014 04:05 pm UTC

I think I need to look for another fakie.

No way I'm passing with cams. Last time I tried, even with a cat, I failed catastrophically.

E-tests are such a scam.
Posted By: Bryan Lawrence

Re: etest question - March 25, 2014 04:09 pm UTC

Haha that's funny!

Posted By: Stephan Tanchak

Re: etest question - March 25, 2014 04:22 pm UTC

E-tests are in fact the WORST.

Cars will never cause as much pollution as the factories situated here do, yet they are not limited. Logging companies, coal power plants, nuclear plants (Three Mile Island incident where the situation was played down and let the people get irradiated until the evacuation order was given), etc..

List goes on and on. Stopping car pollution isn't even beginning to solve the problem.

You could try running the car on nearly pure methanol, maybe to pass the emissions test.
Posted By: Mark Bondy

Re: etest question - March 25, 2014 10:26 pm UTC

Originally Posted by Stephan Tanchak
E-tests are in fact the WORST. Cars will never cause as much pollution as the factories situated here do...Stopping car pollution isn't even beginning to solve the problem...


Worldwide there are currently over 1 billion cars on the road which account for 23% of the worlds greenhouse gas emissions. Just sayin.... whistle

Posted By: Guillaume Berton

Re: etest question - March 25, 2014 10:35 pm UTC

My cars just sit there and look pretty, so they save the environment tongue
Posted By: Bryan Lawrence

Re: etest question - March 25, 2014 10:44 pm UTC

Haha, I wish I could convince the girlfriend of that. It's getting a bit old hearing about how we never take my car, and I don't even have the excuse of it being on jackstands. Although last time we went to take it it wasn't starting :S
Posted By: Guillaume Berton

Re: etest question - March 25, 2014 11:03 pm UTC

Bah, I'm sure you'll have yours running tip-top soon. I wouldn't worry about it. Besides all good things come to those who wait (and it's true, as anticipation makes that day that much sweeter).
Posted By: Chris Browning

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 12:05 am UTC

I had my 95 AWD e-tested last week and although it was still a 2-stage idle test the tech took a picture of the dash with the key on to show the lights that were illuminated, I have never seen before. I'm not positive but the CEL may be an issue with the new regulations in place.

I've been doing a bit of reading because I failed the test last week for HC at idle. Bump your idle to ~1100 rpm and retard your timing about 2 degrees. Retarding timing will reduce your HC while increasing NOX however with the AWD test they don't test for NOX so it can be a big benefit.

On a side note I wouldn't worry about anything until you know you need a re-test, as Jeff said if the car is in decent shape and at the right AFR with a functioning cat chances are you'll pass.
Posted By: Bryan Lawrence

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 12:15 am UTC

I didn't think you could get away with such a high idle, I thought they have the specs for each car
Posted By: Stephen Richardson

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 12:18 am UTC

Under 1200 rpms from what I remember.
Posted By: Bryan Lawrence

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 12:31 am UTC

Oh ok that's good to know.
Posted By: Stephan Tanchak

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 12:33 am UTC

Originally Posted by Mark Bondy
Worldwide there are currently over 1 billion cars on the road which account for 23% of the worlds greenhouse gas emissions. Just sayin.... whistle


How can they calculate that though. Newer cars are getting more and more efficient. China is a terrible polluter with all their coal plants, countries used to dump their nuclear waste into the oceans, etc.

What I'm saying is if a country actually cares about polluting, they should find different and better ways of doing it. I'm all for cleaning this place up, but there are many things they could do that would have a greater impact.

Not to mention, how easy it is to trick an emissions test (unless you are me. Haha)
Posted By: Stephan Tanchak

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 12:34 am UTC

You can get away with a high idle, if the guys are cool about it, they will just bypass the engine speed.
Posted By: Jeremy Gilbert

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 12:38 am UTC

Mine ran the test with the idle floating between 1200 and 1300.

I agree with:
-Get your AFR's right
-Dump a bunch of methyl hydrate in the tank
-Pull a couple degrees of timing
-Don't worry until it fails (because it probably won't)
Posted By: Stephan Tanchak

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 12:43 am UTC

I actually found that too much of anything is bad. I tried running really lean and that made it worse, so did too much timing pulled AND added.

But do add a GOOD amount of methyl hydrate. I have a feeling I added too little when I was doing mine.
Posted By: Jeremy Gilbert

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 12:58 am UTC

I've never used the timing retard trick myself, but all the shops I know which "help" their customers through etests will pull 1-2 degrees of timing if they think the car/truck will have trouble.
Posted By: Stephen Richardson

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 01:01 am UTC

Just get you afr's propery for idle. The meth I still have no proof it helps being no one has posted a before meth failure and an after meth pass. A proper cat will work wonders aslong as your engine feeds it the proper gases to work right.
Posted By: Stephan Tanchak

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 01:01 am UTC

This one shop I went to, the guy let me just sit there and play around with my settings, free of charge to see if I could get it lower than ~1200PPM shuffle

I should also add, when I took my exhaust apart and wanted to see if my cat was clogged by pointing the inlet downwards and hitting it, this nasty black and dark grey sand looking stuff came pouring out.

With the stock super leaky exhaust, boost leaks (MAF setup at the time), no meth, near dead alternator and an oscillating idle, I failed the test by 20PPM.
Posted By: Sven Hebbard

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 06:09 am UTC


failed test results
2500rpm
PPM- 200 limit and 262 the car scored.
c02 limit is 1 and 3.62 the car scored.. FAILED
idle test
PPM- 200 limit and 293 car scored.
c02 limit is 1 and car scored .87..

and the pass 2 days later

2500rpm
ppm-200 is the limit and 69 car scored.
c02- 1 is the limit and .49 car scored

Idle test
ppm- 200 is the limit and 42 car scored
c02- 1 is the limit and .03 car scored.


PASSED.. yokomaha highflow cat installed, 89 octane, little leaner. idle bummed to 1000rpm and 2L of meth... Less then a 1/4 tank of gas and drive it like I stole it to the test place
Posted By: Stephen Richardson

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 08:11 am UTC

So you installed a cat after the failure? Or was it there before? Because you failed the first test because you were too rich in your tune.
Posted By: Reza Mirza

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 02:34 pm UTC

I'm glad my DSM passed a few months ago with flying colors. Another two more years of worry free DSMing here smile
Posted By: Sven Hebbard

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 02:41 pm UTC

Cat was there the whole time. Also the tu e wasn't dialed in on either times and we just targeted 16 instead if 14.7..

Only huge change was timing by a couple degrees... Drained tank put 89 octane in and 2l of meth
Posted By: Alex Akachinskiy

Re: etest question - March 26, 2014 03:18 pm UTC

I am also happy etest camper. Passed in Ontario with 7 years old highflow 3" magnaflow cat and passed smog again in Cali (factory cat from 95) with flying colours. Still rocking factory unopened 7bolt with 250k.
Posted By: Stephen Richardson

Re: etest question - March 27, 2014 02:21 am UTC

Here is A DSM that failed with full emissions system and a Cat.

[Linked Image]

And after a bit of time with the owner setting up his tune correctly.


[Linked Image]

No meth. No fancy tricks. Just properly tuned so the Cat could do its job.
Posted By: Stephan Tanchak

Re: etest question - March 27, 2014 02:25 am UTC

If you read out that license plate you get "Betsy"
Posted By: Kyle Dolson

Re: etest question - March 27, 2014 02:56 am UTC

Originally Posted by Stephan Tanchak
If you read out that license plate you get "Betsy"


And that's why I call her good 'ol Betsy! rotflmao
Posted By: Lucian Marta

Re: etest question - March 27, 2014 04:39 am UTC

Has anybody successfully passed the sniffer test with 272 cams, and I mean legally? tongue
Posted By: Salomon Ponte

Re: etest question - March 27, 2014 06:11 am UTC

I have...multiple times.

BC272s, full 3" turboback (w. OEM cat switched in for e-test), Super 94 (fuel, not the turbo :P).

Not even a need to specially tune it...that OEM cat, despite having 200k on it and being over 20 years old gives me near perfect results.
Posted By: Stephen Richardson

Re: etest question - March 27, 2014 11:56 am UTC

OEM cat are excellent at their jobs. As long as they haven't been murdered. It's not so much a " Special Tune" it's taking the time to make sure you have no mechanical issues and setting up your idle tune properly.
Posted By: Jeff Mitchell

Re: etest question - March 27, 2014 02:52 pm UTC

My original downpipe with stock cat was always my "cheater pipe". Since it just takes a few minutes I would generally swap that in before an e-test just to be safe. I only failed once when I didn't have the airflow signal to the ECU hooked up smile

I still have that stock DP and cat laying around if anyone needs one (2G).
Posted By: Lucian Marta

Re: etest question - March 27, 2014 04:36 pm UTC

I have the stock secondary cat off my Elantra I should weld in, maybe find another smaller OEM cat to be safe. I know the Elantra with both OEM cats with 300k blew almost 0's on it's last e-test (Back when they had the sniffer)

Salomon, glad to hear you passed with cams
Posted By: Salomon Ponte

Re: etest question - March 27, 2014 04:51 pm UTC

Yeah...I had originally tried with a high-flow 3" but that never really worked for me...but with the OEM cat I can drive it there cold and it will still pass...that thing is amazing. There's a reason the OEM ones cost $1k++
Posted By: Jay Stacey

Re: etest question - April 01, 2014 08:21 pm UTC

Hey cause were talking etests.

I went to see if I can get my sticker for my 97. I put it on the road last spring so my etest was still valid for a week or so. Well I didnt need to get it done. Even tho my birthday is in may and the etest will be invalid by then.

So another 2 years before an etest for me!!

Thats 3 years between etest! and Ill blow it up before i need another etest!

FukuGov!
Posted By: Deep Mann

Re: etest question - April 01, 2014 08:50 pm UTC

You sure about that ? odd year cars are due this year.
Posted By: Jeremy Gilbert

Re: etest question - April 01, 2014 09:07 pm UTC

Originally Posted by Deep Mann
You sure about that ? odd year cars are due this year.


But his etest from last year is still valid right now. So that is his odd-year car's etest. It's a small loophole, but I'm taking advantage of it this year as well.

Here's hoping they abolish it by 2016 rotate
Posted By: Rob Strelecki

Re: etest question - April 01, 2014 09:07 pm UTC

It's strange that they would give you a 1-year sticker last year (for sure 2-year would be denied) and then let you use the same e-test to get a 2-year sticker this year. Maybe the loophole is that they don't check if the e-test has already been used to grant a sticker? Since it was done within a year, it was still valid for a 2-year from the test-required year forward..
Posted By: Stephen Richardson

Re: etest question - April 02, 2014 12:18 am UTC

I can see etests disappearing in the next 4 years they are becoming redundant. Most cars from 2006 are going 7 years before it's first etest. And now with the telematics built into most new cars I am sure the goverment will just find away to get that info and send you a letter tell you to get your sh!t fixed then give you 30 days and shut your car down till it is fixed. Big brother is awesome...

Posted By: Brandon Clement

Re: etest question - April 02, 2014 05:54 pm UTC

Pay mechanic $150 and get an e-test. Best way to do it
Posted By: Chad Robertson

Re: etest question - April 04, 2014 06:21 pm UTC

Emission tests are easy to pass. It's a no-brainer. My 89 Colt GTT (4G61T) with a 4G63T swap passed clean as a whistle, under 1.6 standards. This is with the fuel trims maxed out trying to pull fuel for idle/cruise.

If the prov conservatives get into power, they say they'll cancel emissions testing. Now...believe a politician?
Posted By: Frank Young

Re: etest question - April 22, 2014 12:42 am UTC

My '95 ESI is up for e-test, and now that only a handful of shops now do both the tail-pipe and repairs, my choices are limited.

Has anyone recently done the test recently in Mississauga and can recommend the place? I search the gov't site, and they've listed:

Meadowvale Toyota
Aquataine Auto Centre
Streetwise Automotive
Canadian Tire - Dundas/Winston Chruchill
Mississauga Hyundai

I just want an honest e-test facility to do any work in the event it fails.
Posted By: Terry S

Re: etest question - April 22, 2014 02:23 am UTC

not in Mississauga but they do both the old 2 speed idle style (for 97's and older) and the new style Etesting.

Bratin Auto Muffler LTD
82 Main St. N
Georgetown, Ontario L7G 3H3
905-873-6127

Bratin Auto Muffler

Posted By: Jeff Mitchell

Re: etest question - April 22, 2014 07:33 am UTC

Originally Posted by Frank Young
I search the gov't site, and they've listed:

Meadowvale Toyota
Aquataine Auto Centre
Streetwise Automotive
Canadian Tire - Dundas/Winston Chruchill
Mississauga Hyundai

I just want an honest e-test facility to do any work in the event it fails.


I don't think those are the only places in Mississauga, maybe that was just the first page of results? I took mine to an Active Green + Ross near Eglinton and Dixie. It seemed ok but I didn't get any repairs.
Posted By: Jroslaw plawski

Re: etest question - April 24, 2014 11:38 pm UTC

I just did an emission test today of my 97 gst spider and all went with flying colors .
Posted By: Frank Young

Re: etest question - May 03, 2014 02:57 pm UTC

My 95 ESI (no-mods) passed! Here are the results:

2500 RPM IDLE
Limit Reading Result Limit Reading Result
HC 200 123 PASS 200 84 PASS
CO 1 0.2 PASS 1 0.03 PASS
RPM 2250-2750 N/A BYPASS < 1250 N/A BYPASS
Dilution 6 14.67 VALID 6 14.46 VALID

Caved in and did the test at CDN tire. I was told they couldn't get an accurate RPM reading, so they bypassed. Can someone explain Dilution and how my 14.67 is valid!?!

Based on above, would you say my engine is good condition? I jus can't figure out why i'm now getting about 150km's less per tank fill.
Posted By: Bryan Lawrence

Re: etest question - May 03, 2014 03:06 pm UTC

Do a compression test, do a boost leak test.
Posted By: Stephen Richardson

Re: etest question - May 03, 2014 03:11 pm UTC

Its an ESI. Boost leak is redunant. Compression test is a good idea though.

Dilution is a ratio of CO and CO2.

You cant really tell how your engine is running without pre-cat number. But check your plugs and filter aswell.
Posted By: Bryan Lawrence

Re: etest question - May 03, 2014 03:17 pm UTC

Where is the MAS on an ESI?

I don't see one in any pictures, how does it meter air? just vacuum?
Posted By: Stephen Richardson

Re: etest question - May 03, 2014 05:22 pm UTC

ESI's are factory Speed density. They use a MAP not a MAF or MAS.
Posted By: Frank Young

Re: etest question - May 08, 2014 06:53 pm UTC

It was the flexable portion of the exhast between the O2 sensor and the cat. Rust had finally eaten itself through in several sections, so says my mechanic who noticed while replacing the driver side ball joint. He's surprised i passed the e-test at all, they didn't look up front for exhast leaks .. never mind i got passing gas results. He put some epoxy over the whole section, i can already feel the car running a lot smoother.

So i'll get that fixed next week. Rather than replace the whole down pipe piece, he'll chop off the affected area and put a custom flex pipe piece.
Posted By: Mike Lane

Re: etest question - May 08, 2014 11:49 pm UTC

I m going to have fun with a 98 using a 96 EPROM ECU and a 6 bolt swap arent I ? I think they are going to want to use the new OBD2 scanner driving cycles BS.

I want to try and get hot rod status by documenting that the 6 bolt to be installed was never sold in a 98?? Sniffer test FTW...

I have no idea yet how much emissions the swap lets me keep and what link will let me do if I need an OBD2 scan. DAMN 98.

Posted By: Mike Lane

Re: etest question - May 09, 2014 03:26 am UTC

What does no emissions refer to deleting ?

Trying to balance weight reduction, simplicity, and cleanliness with not getting in too much trouble smile
Posted By: Rob Strelecki

Re: etest question - May 09, 2014 03:56 am UTC

Originally Posted by Mike Lane
Sniffer test FTW...


Sniffer test FTL!!!

Goddamnitsomuch.........
Posted By: Stephan Tanchak

Re: etest question - May 09, 2014 06:10 am UTC

Plug in test is WAY easier to pass for us.
Posted By: Mike Eng

Re: etest question - May 09, 2014 12:10 pm UTC

Originally Posted by Nick Gallo
Originally Posted by Mike Lane
What does no emissions refer to deleting ?


Everything.. No solenoids, no charcoal canister, no cat, nothing left.


Yeah buddy!! tu
Posted By: Bryan Lawrence

Re: etest question - May 15, 2014 09:42 pm UTC

bitch failed today, 2500rpm was fine but HC on idle was 270.
I am going to do some idle tuning and then raise it up to 1000 and try again.

Also curious if anyone had issue with idle test and the rpm signal. We had to use the cigarette lighter because the count was doubled from the plugs, i assume from wasted spark but don't remember this issue last time.
Posted By: Stephen Richardson

Re: etest question - May 15, 2014 10:00 pm UTC

Can you post up a pic or pm me your VIN.
Posted By: Stephen Richardson

Re: etest question - May 16, 2014 01:20 am UTC

Yeah try and get those things discused set better. Does she misfire at idle?
Posted By: Bryan Lawrence

Re: etest question - May 16, 2014 01:22 am UTC

Yeah I think she is a bit. It definitely does when I give it gas on cold starts.
Posted By: Stephen Richardson

Re: etest question - May 16, 2014 01:29 am UTC

Your CO looks good. just the hc at idle are pointing toward misfire. could just be density misfire but try and smooth out those setting I bet once you get those things in link set up proper it will pass.
Posted By: Bryan Lawrence

Re: etest question - May 16, 2014 01:31 am UTC

Ok I was thinking the same thing! Thanks a lot!!
Posted By: Stephan Tanchak

Re: etest question - May 16, 2014 06:28 am UTC

I can help if you send me a log if you want. For the record, too much of anything (lean/rich, timing added/pulled) is bad.
© 2024 Club DSM Canada