Originally Posted by Tim Sedore
According to mitsu it is the opposite. The mechanic has to determine that the part failed due toa defect in order to be covered. I would love to find this legislature


Find the legislature stating otherwise (that they have to prove it was something you did, etc.) and get a lawyer-friend to write an intimidating letter. Nothing gets peoples' minds changed like some fance legalese and the chance of losing in court.

As Jeremy said, I've also had good luck with Cambridge Mitsubishi as far as parts go - never been there for service though.

They've got ~6 or 7 brand new Evo X's that have been sitting on the lot for ages. 3 or 4 MRs and 3 GSRs. Actually went to 'test drive' one yesterday but they close at 6 frown

'92 Talon TSi AWD - 5 Speed/E16G/12.385s @ 115.13mph