Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Failed e test!! #95125
December 13, 2001 04:04 pm UTC
December 13, 2001 04:04 pm UTC
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 383
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Dino Mustedanagic Offline OP
Member
Dino Mustedanagic  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 383
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
here are readings

hc: 239 (limit: 76)
co%: 9.39 (limit: 0.42)
no ppm: 229 (limit: 848)

What should i do guys i know i always got strange problems...

any suggestions


1990 Eagle Talon NT Converted TSi(Ripped)
1990 TSI AWD BABY (Ripped)
1992 TSI FWD (Getting Ready)
ICQ 37391874
Re: Failed e test!! #95126
December 13, 2001 04:11 pm UTC
December 13, 2001 04:11 pm UTC
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,447
Onurmomstitties
Mike Jackson Offline

Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
Mike Jackson  Offline

Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,447
Onurmomstitties
First search the archives.


1998 AWD 12.1@122 421whp -SOLD
Duck Dodgers = EPIC FAILZ!
Re: Failed e test!! #95127
December 13, 2001 05:08 pm UTC
December 13, 2001 05:08 pm UTC
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,278
Grimsby, Ontario
C
Craig Watson Offline
Member
Craig Watson  Offline
Member
C
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,278
Grimsby, Ontario
Dino,

Start with Mike's suggestion...

..then where is the other set of data? You should have an idle test and a running/load test.

there's no way you should be getting HC and CO readings that high with a newly built engine.. looks like there is WAY too much fuel getting in there. But I have no idea of what you did when you converted your NT to a Turbo, other than realizing you would have to swap the engine and the ECU.. How's the car running? (I'd probably expect "not well") Is your firing order and timing set right? How about your O2 sensor? The catalytic may have a 'small' part in this, but it wouldn't be where I'd start with numbers like that

looks like something's either busted, or out of adjustment.

[ December 13, 2001: Message edited by: Craig Watson ]


93 Talon Tsi AWD

my website
Re: Failed e test!! #95128
December 13, 2001 05:33 pm UTC
December 13, 2001 05:33 pm UTC
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 6,079
Mississauga, Ontario
J
Jeff Mitchell Offline

Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
Jeff Mitchell  Offline

Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
****
J
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 6,079
Mississauga, Ontario
I exhausted all my knowledge about high HCs (very little wink ) in <A HREF="http://www.ca.dsm.org/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=7&t=001614">Len's thread</A> about the same problem (roughly).

Sounds like he just needed his timing properly adjusted, although he was much closer to the limit.

[ December 13, 2001: Message edited by: Jeff Mitchell ]

Re: Failed e test!! #95129
December 13, 2001 05:47 pm UTC
December 13, 2001 05:47 pm UTC
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,197
Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Mark Bernacki Offline
Member
Mark Bernacki  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,197
Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Judging by your readings.....something is really wrong. Do you have a garden hose connected right into the intake manifold pouring gas in?

Lots of black smoke?

Plugs, wires, timing, O2 sensor, catalytic, intake leaks etc etc. (im probably missing a few)


2003 50th Anniv. Corvette Coupe
Re: Failed e test!! #95130
December 13, 2001 10:03 pm UTC
December 13, 2001 10:03 pm UTC
Joined: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,971
Beamsville, Ont, Canada
Steve Kinnaird Offline

Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
Steve Kinnaird  Offline

Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
*****
Joined: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,971
Beamsville, Ont, Canada
Craig:They don't give us "dyno" guys the results of the idle test.. just one set of results.

I would agree that there is something DRASTICALLY wrong here.

With no cat, and a steady miss during the test my resluts were better than that..

HC:90, CO: 0.70, NO: 1074

From what I know about emissions (ie: not much) I would agree that the car is running WAY too rich.. Have you checked the 02 sensor?


Now, I'll have all kinds of time to talk about DSMs, because I won't be busy fixing mine!
Re: Failed e test!! #95131
December 13, 2001 10:26 pm UTC
December 13, 2001 10:26 pm UTC
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,197
Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Mark Bernacki Offline
Member
Mark Bernacki  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,197
Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Heres another question

Hows your gas mileage?


2003 50th Anniv. Corvette Coupe
Re: Failed e test!! #95132
December 14, 2001 01:06 am UTC
December 14, 2001 01:06 am UTC
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 99
Whitby
T
Tony Spelchuk Offline
Member
Tony Spelchuk  Offline
Member
T
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 99
Whitby
You should check the timing but the cat has to be a empty can to get a reading that high. Is it running real hot?

[ December 13, 2001: Message edited by: Tony Spelchuk ]

Re: Failed e test!! #95133
December 14, 2001 03:34 am UTC
December 14, 2001 03:34 am UTC
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,787
Malaysia
Jeremy Chin Offline
Member
Jeremy Chin  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,787
Malaysia
looks like u are running rich...

is there any chance you might still be using the N/T MAS? Tony said he was running rich until he changed to a turbo MAS.


300hp Talon to a 50hp Citroen. Lovely ain't it?
Back to another Mits.
A Mirage Cyborg as a future 4G63T candidate.

"I've had more Mitsu's than you can imagine"
Re: Failed e test!! #95134
December 14, 2001 01:25 pm UTC
December 14, 2001 01:25 pm UTC
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 383
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Dino Mustedanagic Offline OP
Member
Dino Mustedanagic  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 383
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
No no Jeremy i'm running Turbo Maf but i'll try to get a/f ratio gauge first and see what heppens i think i got big vacume leak also i'll check the o2 sensor..

Also wanna know is there difference between turbo and nt o2 sensors maybe thats why i'm running too rich...


1990 Eagle Talon NT Converted TSi(Ripped)
1990 TSI AWD BABY (Ripped)
1992 TSI FWD (Getting Ready)
ICQ 37391874
Re: Failed e test!! #95135
December 14, 2001 05:51 pm UTC
December 14, 2001 05:51 pm UTC
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,278
Grimsby, Ontario
C
Craig Watson Offline
Member
Craig Watson  Offline
Member
C
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,278
Grimsby, Ontario
Dino,

!! if you have a vacuum leak look into that first !! this could be contributing to your problem if it's not the source of your problem.

you don't necessarily need an A/F gauge, you could make it by with a digital multi meter if you have on (just hook the positive lead of the meter to the O2 sensor 'plug' and ground the other lead)

I'm personally not sure if there's a difference in the 02 sensors. Maybe someone else does?

[ December 14, 2001: Message edited by: Craig Watson ]


93 Talon Tsi AWD

my website
Re: Failed e test!! #95136
December 14, 2001 08:26 pm UTC
December 14, 2001 08:26 pm UTC
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 383
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Dino Mustedanagic Offline OP
Member
Dino Mustedanagic  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 383
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Thnaks Craig, the car was stalling at idle until i clean the thortle body after that its feelnow doesnt stall at all at the lights, then i cannt fill if there is a vacume leak but i'm assuming there is one...So i got to go all over the intake manifold to check for vacume leaks and also check the o2 sensor i got the digital voltmeter so i hope its not gone if its gone got to go with turbo one vire o2 sensor because i think there is difference....

Thnaks a million craig hope this is going to solve problem...

[ December 14, 2001: Message edited by: Dino Mustedanagic ]


1990 Eagle Talon NT Converted TSi(Ripped)
1990 TSI AWD BABY (Ripped)
1992 TSI FWD (Getting Ready)
ICQ 37391874
Re: Failed e test!! #95137
December 14, 2001 09:18 pm UTC
December 14, 2001 09:18 pm UTC
Joined: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,971
Beamsville, Ont, Canada
Steve Kinnaird Offline

Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
Steve Kinnaird  Offline

Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
*****
Joined: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,971
Beamsville, Ont, Canada
If he's got a vacuum leak, wouldn't he be running lean?? ie: sucking in unmetered air, not losing it...


Now, I'll have all kinds of time to talk about DSMs, because I won't be busy fixing mine!
Re: Failed e test!! #95138
December 14, 2001 10:07 pm UTC
December 14, 2001 10:07 pm UTC
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 650
Unionville, Ontario, Canada
E
Edwin Lau Offline
Member
Edwin Lau  Offline
Member
E
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 650
Unionville, Ontario, Canada
I think it would be the other way around...it would be losing metered air...the ecu will have calculated the amount of fuel to put in for the amount of air at the maf, then some of the air is leaked out and your car would be running too much fuel when compared to the amount of air that has gone into the engine


laux3640@mach1.wlu.ca
92 Talon TSI AWD less
89 Probe GT
Re: Failed e test!! #95139
December 14, 2001 10:30 pm UTC
December 14, 2001 10:30 pm UTC
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 6,079
Mississauga, Ontario
J
Jeff Mitchell Offline

Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
Jeff Mitchell  Offline

Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
****
J
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 6,079
Mississauga, Ontario
It really depends where your leak is. I know there is a vendor that sells intake pipes with extra little ports to suck in unmetered air and lean it out.

A leak post turbo (since it's under pressure) will usually force out metered air and make you run rich like Edwin said.

Re: Failed e test!! #95140
December 14, 2001 10:43 pm UTC
December 14, 2001 10:43 pm UTC
Joined: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,971
Beamsville, Ont, Canada
Steve Kinnaird Offline

Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
Steve Kinnaird  Offline

Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
*****
Joined: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,971
Beamsville, Ont, Canada
ok, thought about it a little more, and we're all right. wink sorta..

I was thinking after the throttle body.. (ie: injector insulators, or intake manifold gasket, one of the actual vacuum lines..."vacuum" leak got me thinking along those lines..)

One between the turbo and throttle body (intake leak)is MUCH more likely though, which would make him run rich..

Well, start with a pressure test I suppose...

[ December 14, 2001: Message edited by: Steve Kinnaird ]


Now, I'll have all kinds of time to talk about DSMs, because I won't be busy fixing mine!
Re: Failed e test!! #95141
December 16, 2001 09:35 am UTC
December 16, 2001 09:35 am UTC
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 383
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Dino Mustedanagic Offline OP
Member
Dino Mustedanagic  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 383
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Guys i was searching through the vfaq and i found that i dont have the ground conected to the down pipe could this effect the mixture for the o2 sensor....

Thanks


1990 Eagle Talon NT Converted TSi(Ripped)
1990 TSI AWD BABY (Ripped)
1992 TSI FWD (Getting Ready)
ICQ 37391874
Re: Failed e test!! #95142
December 16, 2001 02:06 pm UTC
December 16, 2001 02:06 pm UTC
Joined: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,971
Beamsville, Ont, Canada
Steve Kinnaird Offline

Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
Steve Kinnaird  Offline

Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
*****
Joined: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,971
Beamsville, Ont, Canada
Most definatley!

It will make you run really rich! There's a good chance that's your problem...


Now, I'll have all kinds of time to talk about DSMs, because I won't be busy fixing mine!
Re: Failed e test!! #95143
December 16, 2001 04:38 pm UTC
December 16, 2001 04:38 pm UTC
Joined: Jul 1998
Posts: 104
calgary alberta
B
Bill Fowlie Offline
Member
Bill Fowlie  Offline
Member
B
Joined: Jul 1998
Posts: 104
calgary alberta
the co reading is huge, do not idle your car in
enclosed spaces, I am not kidding
that is high enough to cause co poisoning in just a few minutes. If you were to idle a 9% co car
in a closed garage you would probably be dead
in 5-10 minutes. I am not joking contact the emissions test place to verify this

Re: Failed e test!! #95144
December 17, 2001 07:06 pm UTC
December 17, 2001 07:06 pm UTC
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 650
Unionville, Ontario, Canada
E
Edwin Lau Offline
Member
Edwin Lau  Offline
Member
E
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 650
Unionville, Ontario, Canada
Quote
Originally posted by Bill Fowlie:
the co reading is huge, do not idle your car in
enclosed spaces, I am not kidding
that is high enough to cause co poisoning in just a few minutes. If you were to idle a 9% co car
in a closed garage you would probably be dead
in 5-10 minutes.


Man, that reminds me of Jeff's car at the dyno, we couldn't even open our eyes and the dyno guy (who was driving) was dying inside the garage... laugh laugh

[ December 17, 2001: Message edited by: Edwin Lau ]

[ December 17, 2001: Message edited by: Edwin Lau ]


laux3640@mach1.wlu.ca
92 Talon TSI AWD less
89 Probe GT
Re: Failed e test!! #95145
December 17, 2001 10:32 pm UTC
December 17, 2001 10:32 pm UTC
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 383
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Dino Mustedanagic Offline OP
Member
Dino Mustedanagic  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 383
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
heyy guys some good news...

o2 sensor was gone the reading was 0.013 volts

after replacing o2 sensor it was reading 1.6 to 1.7 volts then changed the injector gaskets or o- rings and it came down to 1.4 still high right so what else can i look for to get it down to 1.0 volt

[ December 17, 2001: Message edited by: Dino Mustedanagic ]


1990 Eagle Talon NT Converted TSi(Ripped)
1990 TSI AWD BABY (Ripped)
1992 TSI FWD (Getting Ready)
ICQ 37391874

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1