|
Re: 6.77 seconds?
#350
November 09, 2004 02:54 am UTC
November 09, 2004 02:54 am UTC
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: 6.77 seconds?
#352
November 09, 2004 03:12 am UTC
November 09, 2004 03:12 am UTC
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,857 Oakville, ON
Nigel Smith
Insane Member
|
Insane Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,857
Oakville, ON
|
newer cars nowadays are being built to be faster, I wouldnt buy a galant now though, hell I wouldnt buy anything mitsubishi had to offer if I could afford it, every car they make has competition thats better, and priced similarly...
Past 1992 Tsi AWD 1992 Tsi 14.30@100 Stock w/ MAF-T 1992 Tsi AWD 13.03@105 1.71 60' 1991 Tsi AWD
|
|
|
Re: 6.77 seconds?
#353
November 09, 2004 01:12 pm UTC
November 09, 2004 01:12 pm UTC
|
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 6,079 Mississauga, Ontario
Jeff Mitchell
Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
|
Senior Member, with Far TOO Much Time on Their Hands
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 6,079
Mississauga, Ontario
|
Originally posted by Pete Jakubowski: Who cares? Hey dumbass, if you don't care, then don't post.
|
|
|
|
|
|