Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Ontario Drive Clean 2013 [Re: Jay Warwick (Pham)] #398180
March 21, 2013 08:11 pm UTC
March 21, 2013 08:11 pm UTC
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,438
Kitchener Ontario
Stephen Richardson Offline
Insane Member
Stephen Richardson  Offline
Insane Member
****
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,438
Kitchener Ontario
^^^^What He Said^^^^ And plus even if the bulb doesn't light the scan tool will still know.

Last edited by Stephen Richardson; March 21, 2013 08:12 pm UTC.
Re: Ontario Drive Clean 2013 [Re: Jay Warwick (Pham)] #398212
March 22, 2013 01:57 pm UTC
March 22, 2013 01:57 pm UTC
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,864
Fort Erie, Ont
J
Jay Warwick (Pham) Offline OP
Serious Member
Jay Warwick (Pham)  Offline OP
Serious Member
*****
J
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,864
Fort Erie, Ont
The new test is so stringent that people are failing left and right.

If you've recently had work done to an emissons control function (cat converter, EGR, etc), or removed your battery to perform something on the vehicle unrelated to emissions (installing a new stereo, wiring in an accessory, etc), when you bring your vehicle in, your monitors will likely "not be ready".

The problem with this is twofold. The new OBD2 test logs drive cycles, meaning that you can't just clear your engine code two minutes before the test and expect to pass. You won't. The second problem is if you do this knowingly, and the test determines your vehicle isn't ready, you're on the hook for the $39.95 for the etest even though an actual test wasn't performed. Furthermore, you'll have to bring the vehicle back when there is sufficient drive cycle data, and you guessed it, you're paying another $17.50 for your re-test!


03 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V///
93 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution I
95 & 97 DSM
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1