So this is the analysis.

Nothing *appears* to be wrong with either part(s), yet I should replace both? I'm sort of at a loss for words and a complete loss of understanding.

His exact words were 'Nothing appers to be wrong with clutch, nothing with transmission'... so what exactly is wrong with my car and why is he recommending I spent 2000$ out of the blue? I'm lost here guys, help me out.. I'm not certain if it's a language barrier but I tried my best to understand and phrase in multiple variances so it'd be clear.

What should I do? Have the car taken somewhere else now?

I just cannot grasp the concept of spending that much money if you can't even tell me what the problem is, and you tell me there appears to be none?